Legal Opinion

Turchan v. Marzall

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 13, 1952No. 2052-51PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, District Judge.

In this action the plaintiffs seek the issuance of a patent. The claim involved has been finally rejected by the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office, and the plaintiffs have come to this Court to have the decision of the Patent Office reviewed. They are entitled to do so under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, as amended. Section 63, Title 35, U.S.C.A.

*267The claimed invention of the plaintiffs consists of certain improvements in hydraulic duplicating lathe attachments. The alleged invention comprises, among other things, .a hydraulically operated duplicating mechanism…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Jones v. Sykes Metal Lath & Roofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  5. In Re CrowellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LAITRAM CORPORATION v. Deepsouth Packing Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  2. Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API