Legal Opinion

Portland General Electric Co. v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 1989No. 88-AB-192, 88-AB-192-A; CA A47722PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board allowing benefits and reversing the referee’s determination that claimant was discharged for misconduct. Because we conclude that EAB’s conclusions are not rationally related to its findings of fact, we reverse and remand.

Claimant worked as a lineman for employer from July 21,1978, to September 29,1987. That job required him to climb power poles, perform electrical repairs and deal with low and high voltage power lines. On January 8, 1987, employer suspended claimant, alleging that he had been intoxicated on the job and giving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Bremer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Christensen v. Employment DivivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. James River Corp. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Veneer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Veneer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API