Wills v. Wills
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion to strike out bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Leaming, V. C.
1 entertain the view that the provisions of the will in question fall within the defined rule of construction that where lands are devised in the first instance in language indeterminate as to the quantity of the estate from which an estate for life would result by implication, and words adapted to the creation of a power of disposal, without reservation as to mode of execution, are added, the construction will be that an estate in fee is given. I am unable to find in the power of sale contained in the fifth paragraph of the will any limitation upon the power of disposition…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Gaston v. FordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Central Hanover Bank Trust Co. v. HelmeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Rusch v. MeloshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. PriceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Ampere Bank and Trust Co. v. EsterlyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.