Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Tri-State Transit Co. of La.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1933No. 4577PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

In this case the lower court, in a well-prepared opinion, has discussed the testimony and correctly decided the issues of fact. We ■fully concur'in the opinion as to the liability of defendant for the amount of damages plaintiff received in the accident.

The opinion of the lower court is as follows:

“In this suit plaintiff seeks to recover damages resulting from an intersectional collision between his Chevrolet automobile and a passenger bus owned and operated by defendant. The collision occurred on the 22d day of May, 1932, at the intersection of Georgia avenue and North Vienna…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Croft v. Southern Hardwood Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. CohenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Murphy v. HartleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Stern v. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mayfield v. CrowdusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Heyden v. DubosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Kotteman Furniture Co. v. McLellanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Johnson v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Herbert v. LanghoffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API