Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. Crowdus

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1934No. 3954PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The appellee, as plaintiff below, recovered damages against appellant (defendant at the trial) for the death of appellee’s wife from injuries suffered in an automobile collision occurring at the intersection of Picacho avenue and Alameda boulevard in the town of Las Cruces. The trial was before the district court of Otero county on change of venue. The judgment was entered on the verdict of a jury charged in a manner agreeable to bo:* parties, as evidenced by the absence of exceptions to the trial court’s affirmative instructions. Complaint is made, however, of the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Shuck v. KeefeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Comfort v. PennerWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Calhoon v. D. C. & F. Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Lawe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  2. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of ChicagoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Barrois v. NotoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Bass v. DehnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API