Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Loiseau

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 5, 2005No. 03-04-00748-CVPublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice.

After being appointed by the Texas Insurance Commissioner to serve as a Special Deputy Receiver for a conglomerate of entities 1 accused of participating in a mul- ti-state scheme of insurance fraud, appel-lee Robert Loiseau brought suit, as the assignee of the victims’ claims, to liquidate and collect the entities’ assets on behalf of the victims. Among the 140 defendants sued in the receivership action, Gene En-nis was named in his individual capacity as a “general agent,” and two companies for which Ennis is president, Fidelity Benefit Administrators and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Schlobohm v. SchapiroTexas Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Western Builders of Amarillo, Inc. (In Re Morrison)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Morris v. Kohls-York, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  3. Julie Stull & JMJ Productions v. Greg LaPlant and Chris Kolaskos, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  4. Niehaus v. Cedar Bridge, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  5. Tabacinic v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API