Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2001No. 2000-1865PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 92.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. KATHMAN. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman,

2001-Ohio-157.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension—Practicing under a trade name—Assisting nonattorneys to market or sell living trusts. (No. 00-1865—Submitted January 9, 2001—Decided June 13, 2001.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 00-15. __________________ MOYER, C.J. {¶ 1} Relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a complaint charging respondent,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Inf. Miller v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. MullaneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. FishmanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. WheatleyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KramerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. HeislerOhio Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API