Legal Opinion
Utica Mutual Insurance v. 215 West 91st Street Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 7, 2001PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the defendant Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company is obligated to defend and/or indemnify the defendant 215 West 91st Street Corp. in two actions entitled Conley v 215 W. 91st St. Corp. and Cittadine v 215 W. 91st St. Corp., both pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, the defendants 215 West 91st Street Corp. and Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated June 13, 2000, as denied that branch of their motion which was for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hartford Insurance Group v. MelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Rebell v. Emigrant Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Charter Oak InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by15 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Twin City Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Yoda, LLC v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Wise v. McCallaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Daimler Chrysler Insurance v. Zurich InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.