Legal Opinion

Rebell v. Emigrant Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1999PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered January 27, 1998, *492which denied defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion of defendant Harvard Maintenance to the extent of dismissing the complaint as against it, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant Harvard Maintenance dismissing the complaint as against it.

Summary judgment was properly denied as to defendant Emigrant Savings Bank since issues of fact exist as to whether Emigrant created or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palka v. Servicemaster Management Services Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Jiuz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Quintana v. MeiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Sphere Drake Insurance v. Block 7206 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Sirius America Insurance Co. v. Vigo Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Utica Mutual Insurance v. 215 West 91st Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. A & S Trucking Service, Inc. v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API