Legal Opinion
Daimler Chrysler Insurance v. Zurich Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 13, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has no duty to defend or indemnify the defendants Charles DeStefano and RI Suresky & Sons, Inc., in an underlying personal injury action entitled Elston v DeStefano, pending in the Supreme Court, Orange County, under index No. 5283/ 06, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), entered October 30, 2008, which, *731upon an order of the same court dated August 28, 2008, denying its motion for summary judgment and granting the cross motion of the defendants Zurich Insurance Company,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Twin City Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. 215 West 91st Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Charter Oak InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Donato v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Zurich American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- 206-208 Main Street Associates Inc. v. Arch InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- 206-208 Main Street Associates Inc. v. Arch InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Mazl Bldg., LLC v. Greenwich Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Usoiani v. Dumbo Moving & Stor., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025