Butterworth v. Boyd
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
12 Cal.2d 140 (1938)
CHARLES T. BUTTERWORTH et al., Petitioners,
v.
HAROLD J. BOYD, as Controller, etc., et al., Respondents.
S. F. No. 16017.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
September 2, 1938.
Cushing & Cushing and Ben C. Duniway for Petitioners.
William P. O'Brien, as Amicus Curiae, on Behalf of Petitioners.
John J. O'Toole, City Attorney, Thomas P. Slevin, Deputy City Attorney, and Frank L. Fenton for Respondents.
Joseph McInerney, Vladimir Vucinich, Charles H. Brennan, O'Brien, Dibert & Acton, Lillian M. Wollitz, U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Lionel Browne and Neil Cunningham, Deputies…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- McAuliffe v. Mayor and Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.