Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Emery

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1944No. 36,243PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.;

A widow, holding a life interest in real estate, brought action to establish her ownership of certain permanent improvements and her right to remove them. The defendants, owners of the remainder title, asserted that the pleadings disclosed that the ownership of the improvements had been determined in a prior action, and they moved for judgment on the pleadings. The motion was overruled, and they appeal. The only issue is whether the interest of the parties in the improvements had become res judicata.

The material facts, alleged or admitted by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snehoda v. First National Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Naugle v. NaugleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Stimec v. VerderberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Levi v. LeviSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Mydland v. MydlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crutsinger v. HessDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1976
  2. Bellport v. HarderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Wharton v. ZengerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Coffey v. GilbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API