Legal Opinion
Smith v. Southwest Feed Yards, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 18, 1991No. 07-90-0047-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.
By this appeal, we are required to determine whether, and we hold that, the trial court correctly excluded a party’s testimony when, without good cause, he was not disclosed as a witness in response to a discovery interrogatory. Affirmed.
Southwest Feed Yards, Ltd. (Southwest) sued Arnold T. Smith (Smith) to recover upon an open account for custom feeding Smith's cattle. In answering Southwest’s interrogatory, authorized by rule 166b, paragraph 2(d), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure,1 requesting the name and address of each person, including experts, having any knowledge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Sharp v. Broadway National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Clark v. Trailways, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Southwest Feed YardsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Guerrero v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Rogers v. StellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Smith v. Southwest Feed YardsTexas Supreme Court · 1992