Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southwest Feed Yards

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1992No. D-1503PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOGGETT, Justice.

We consider whether an individual should be barred from testifying as a fact witness in his own defense because he in*90completely answered an adversary’s interrogatory seeking discovery of potential witnesses. Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that his testimony should not be excluded.

Southwest Feed Yards, Ltd. sued Arnold T. Smith to recover upon an open account for custom feeding of his cattle. Smith personally answered interrogatories propounded to him by Southwest but failed to include his own name in response to one of these seeking disclosure of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Sharp v. Broadway National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Henry S. Miller Co. v. BynumTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Exxon Corp. v. West Texas Gathering Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Texas Department of Human Services v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  5. City of Fort Worth v. GayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API