Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southwest Feed Yards

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1992No. D-1503Published

1Opinion of the Court

835 S.W.2d 89 (1992)

Arnold T. SMITH, Petitioner,

v.

SOUTHWEST FEED YARDS, Respondent.

No. D-1503.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 24, 1992.

J. Christopher Byrd, Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner.

Rex W. Easterwood, Hereford, for respondent.

OPINION

DOGGETT, Justice.

We consider whether an individual should be barred from testifying as a fact witness in his own defense because he incompletelly answered an adversary's interrogatory seeking discovery of potential witnesses. Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that his testimony should not be excluded.

Southwest Feed Yards, Ltd. sued Arnold T. Smith to…

Also in this document: Dissent · Cornyn; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent · Cornyn.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API