Legal Opinion
Caiado v. Bischoff
Yonkers City Court
Decided July 28, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John R. LaCava, J.
Respondent moves for an order dismissing the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the grounds that the notice to cure is legally insufficient. Petitioner opposes the motion. The motion is granted.
This is a holdover proceeding wherein petitioner claims that he properly exercised his right to terminate respondent’s tenancy by service of a "notice terminating tenancy”. The notice reads as follows:
"Your landlord hereby advises you that you are violating *1015your tenancy at the above premises and the following must be terminated and/or ceased by May…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho LamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Giannini v. StuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Olivero v. DuranCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho LamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Capital Resources Corp. v. DoeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
- Fairview Co. v. IdowuCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990
- Katz Park Avenue Corp. v. OldenCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
- Main Street Mall Corp. v. NR Store, Inc.New Rochelle City Court · 1992
- Cosmopolitan Broadcasting Corp. v. MirandaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989