Legal Opinion
Capital Resources Corp. v. Doe
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 3, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gustin L. Reichbach, J.
Petitioner initiated the instant holdover proceeding against John and Jane Doe, seeking to recover possession of apartment 1 at 840 East 34th Street, Brooklyn. Petitioner now moves to substitute Michael Gore for "John Doe” as a party *865respondent and to amend the caption of the petition and notice of petition to reflect the substitution. Respondent opposes this motion and seeks dismissal of the proceeding.
This case raises the issue of when a petitioner may initiate a "John Doe” proceeding pursuant to CPLR 1024, and what remedy is available if that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Giannini v. StuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Perrotta v. Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Blackgold Realty Corp. v. MilneNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Dulberg v. EbenhartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Teachers College v. WolterdingAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luckern v. Lyonsdale Energy Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoutoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
- Stanford Realty Assoc. v. RollinsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1994
- Redmond v. Jamaica Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority v. WimpfheimerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.