Legal Opinion
New Jersey Wood Finishing Co. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 19, 1963No. Civ. A. 964-61PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGELLI, District Judge.
This is a private action under the antitrust laws of the United States, sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2, and section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 18.
Plaintiff, New Jersey Wood Finishing Company, is engaged in the manufacture of electrical insulation products in this State and in the sale and distribution of said products by independent distributors throughout the United States. Defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”) is a diversified nationwide manufacturing company, also engaged in the electrical insulation field.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Frank Nisley, Jr., Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. John F. Wade, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Howard Balsley, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. UnnamedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Proper v. John Bene & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1923
3Cited by11 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- New Jersey Wood Finishing Company v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, and Essexwire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Highland Supply Corp. v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1963
- Lippa's, Inc. v. Lenox, IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.