Legal Opinion
United States v. Luken
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided August 21, 2007No. CR 06-40130PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, MOTION TO DISMISS, AND CONDITIONAL PLEA
LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant Jonathan Luken’s objections (Doc. 37) to Magistrate John E. Simko’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) denying Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence (Doc. 19), Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Indictment (Doc. 44), and Defendant’s motion to enter a conditional plea to the charge of knowingly possessing computer files that contain images of child pornography (Doc. 39). The Court requested and received…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Adan Garcia-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. CameronDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
- United States v. PrenticeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- United States v. EagleDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2008