Legal Opinion
United States v. Prentice
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 4, 2010No. Criminal 09-343(1) (DWF/RLE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. That the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Confessions or Statements in the Nature of Confessions (Doc. No. [11]) is DENIED.
2. That the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Doc. No. [18]) is DENIED.
3. That the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on the Grounds that the Court does not Have Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. No. [19])…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re National Hockey League Players' Concussion Injury LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Borella v. Black Hills Surgical Hospital, L.L.P.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
- Com. v. Souffrant, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Littlefield v. American Alternative Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022