Legal Opinion

Moore v. Steve's Outboard Service

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2014No. 90115-5PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 This case asks us to examine the nature of a nuisance per se claim. Generally, those alleging that their neighbors’ activities are a nuisance must prove that the activities are, on balance, unreasonable and cause some inconvenience, discomfort, or interference. When, however, an activity is a nuisance per se, plaintiffs need not show that the activity is also unreasonable. Here, the plaintiffs sued their neighbors, arguing, among other things, that the noise, smoke, fumes, and traffic associated with a small motor repair shop was in effect a nuisance in fact and that their…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Branch v. Western Petroleum, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mjd Properties, Llc, Resp. v. Jeffrey Haley, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Sauk-suiattle Indian Tribe, V. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  3. Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Olympic Game Farm, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Buchanan v. Simplot Feeders LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2019
  5. Buchanan v. Simplot Feeders LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API