Legal Opinion

White Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1963No. Appeal, No. 195PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

In this unemployment compensation case benefits Avere denied claimant under section 402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended, 43 PS §802(b) (1), on the basis that his unemployment was due to his voluntarily leaving work without a necessitous and compelling reason.

The bureau and the referee awarded benefits on. the ground that claimant had a necessitous and compelling reason for leaving his employment. On appeal the board reversed the referee and denied benefits under section 402 (b) (1).

At the beginning of 1961, claimant was employed by Sill and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Progress Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Domico Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Naugle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knox v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API