Michopoulos v. State

Appellant was charged by an affidavit and convicted by a jury in the court below of maintaining and assisting in maintaining a common nuisance. Acts 1917 p. 15, §20. By assignments of error he questions the action of the court in overruling his motion for a new trial and his motion in arrest of judgment. The only causes here urged in support of the motion for a new trial are, the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and error of the court in refusing to permit a witness to answer a certain question on cross-examination.

From the evidence it appears that on August 10, 1928,…