Legal Opinion

Field v. S. P. Morse & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1898No. 8054PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ambrose, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

In the latter part- of March, 1893, plaintiffs sold and delivered to S. P. Morse & Co. a quantity of merchandise. In April following plaintiffs instituted this action of *790replevin in the court below to recover the goods so sold. There was a trial to a jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendants, and plaintiffs have prosecuted a petition in error.

Plaintiffs are partners engaged in the wholesale business in Chicago under the name and style of Marshall Field & Co. They predicate the right to maintain this suit upon the ground that they were induced to make the sale of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Johnson v. GulickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hoock v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Phillips v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. First National Bank v. McKinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paul v. CameronNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Calvert Fire Insurance v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1980
  3. Morris v. PosnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API