Legal Opinion

Paul v. Cameron

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1934No. 28962PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action to recover damages on account of an alleged fraud committed by the defendants Melville D. Cameron, Richard C. Peters, and Cornelius J. Claassen in connection with the sale to plaintiff of certain bonds issued by the Keystone Investment Company. Trial had to a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and from the order overruling their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.

The facts, from which the present litigation may be said to have developed, include the following: The Peters Trust Company was a Nebraska corporation, organized in 1907. Defendants Peters and Cameron…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hindman v. First Nat. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  2. Hotaling v. A. B. Leach & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Johnson v. GulickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  3. Offutt Housing Company v. County of SarpyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ashby v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Huffman v. PooreNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API