Legal Opinion

Morris v. Posner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 11, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Pollc District Court. — Hon. C. P. Holmes, Judge. Action of replevin to recover goods sold under false representation of the purchaser. There was' a trial to the court, .and judgment for the defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

1 2 The plaintiffs are merchants in the city of Philadelphia. During the year 1897, the defendant Rachel Posner was engaged in the merchant tailoring business in Des Moines, Iowa, her business being managed by •her husband, Jacob Posner, since deceased. During the summer of that year the plaintiff’s traveling salesman took an order from the defendant Rachel Posner, through her husband, for about one thousand dollars worth of goods, for delivery in the fall. This order was sent to the plaintiffs, and they, on the twenty-eighth of July, wrote Mrs. Posner for a statement of her assets and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. WeareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Newell v. RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. McKown v. FurgasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Reid, Murdock & Fisher v. CowduroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Judd v. WeberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. M. W. O'rieley, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Blaul v. RobySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Barber v. KeelingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Endicott Johnson Corp. v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. In re Woerderhoff Shoe Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API