Legal Opinion

Martinez-Vivanco v. Warden

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 12, 2023No. 0:23-cv-01853Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Lucila Martinez-Vivanco, Case No. 23-cv-1853 (WMW/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden, FCI Waseca, Defendant. Before the Court is Petitioner Lucila Martinez-Vivanco’s “Motion to Expediate and Rule on Appeal Immed[i]ately,” (Dkt. 12), and her application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal, (Dkt. 16). For the reasons addressed below, the motion titled “Motion to Expediate and Rule on Appeal Immed[i]ately” is denied and the application to proceed IFP on appeal is granted. I. Motion for Reconsideration Martinez-Vivanco filed a motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC. v. City of Saint PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API