Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cox

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 25, 1909No. 7201PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Before Prince, J., Florence, January, 1908. Action by H. M. Smith against G. O. Cox. The Circuit decree is: “At the recent fall term of Court of Common Pleas for Florence county the above entitled case was called for trial, and by consent of counsel it was marked ‘heard’ by the Court with leave to counsel to submit written argument.

Read the full summary

Before Prince, J., Florence, January, 1908. Action by H. M. Smith against G. O. Cox. The Circuit decree is: “At the recent fall term of Court of Common Pleas for Florence county the above entitled case was called for trial, and by consent of counsel it was marked ‘heard’ by the Court with leave to counsel to submit written argument. The case had been, by consent, previously referred to J. W. McCown, as special referee, to take and report the testimony, a jury trial having been waived. The case has been considered by me on the pleadings and the testimony reported by the referee. This is an…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action to recover possession of a tract of land, sold by the sheriff under an alleged delinquent land sale.

A trial by jury was waived.

The findings of fact by his Honor, the presiding Judge, are not subject to review by this Court, and his conclusions of law are affirmed for the reasons stated in his decree.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vallentine v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Leysath v. LeysathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  3. Taylor v. StraussSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  4. Carter v. WrotenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Donohue Ex Rel. De Vlaming v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API