Legal Opinion
In re the City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The only proof offered by the city to justify the nominal award allowed by the final decree is .the deed made by claimant to Brooklyn Ash Removal Company, Inc., which conveyed the land abutting the damage parcels by reference to Flat-lands avenue. The deed expressly excluded from the conveyance “ any interest whatsoever ” in and to Flatlands avenue. In our opinion, the reference to Flatlands avenue was merely for the purpose of description and location of the land conveyed and not for the purpose of creating an easement. (Matter of West 229th Street, 135 Misc. 710; affd., 235 App. Div. 608;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of City of N.Y. (Northern Blvd.)New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of City of New York (Sedgwick Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Matter of City of New York (Harrison Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McQuinn v. TantaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Van Schaack v. TorsosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Fink v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Pagano v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1965