Legal Opinion

Pagano v. Kramer

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Kleinfeld, J.

Action to enjoin defendants’ interference with plaintiffs’ use of a 20-foot “ lane ” lying south of, and adjacent to, plaintiffs’ premises, and to compel defendants to remove from the “ lane ” a portion of a building constructed by defendants.

Plaintiffs claim an easement of record as well as prescription by user.

The “ lane ” known as “Smith’s Lane,” was part of a 10-acre parcel which was owned by one Kimball in 1845. By deed dated November 10, 1845, Kimball conveyed the 10-acre parcel to one Mackrell by deed containing the following: ‘ ‘ Excepting and reserving to the party of the first part…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Belotti v. . BickhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Scallon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Rose v. Jasima Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Pulitzer v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pagano v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API