Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. State ex rel. Beckman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1890No. 14,028PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

This proceeding was instituted by Beck-man, drainage commissioner, against the raiiroad company for the purpose of collecting certain ditch assessments.

The complaint shows that a proper petition was filed; that the railroad company was made a party to the proceeding, and was duly notified; that benefits were assessed against its right of way through certain described tracts of land in Lake county, in a specified sum, and that the assessments so made were duly reported to and confirmed by the court. The original proceedings were instituted in the circuit court under the act of 1883. It is also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Wishmier v. State ex rel. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Scott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FishIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Indianapolis & Vincennes Railway Co. v. Capitol Paving & Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Haynes Automobile Co. v. City of KokomoIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API