Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Boney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1889No. 13,449PublishedCited by 45 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

This proceeding was instituted by Mathias Boney against the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company, the complaint being essentially in the nature of a creditor’s bill. Putting aside much irrelevant matter set up in the pleadings, the material facts upon which the questions for decision depend are the following:

In September, 1874, Boney entered into a written contract with the Indianapolis, Delphi and Chicago Railroad Company, under which he constructed the grade, and otherwise prepared about three miles of the company’s road-bed in Lake county, ready for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Ager v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bloxham v. Florida Central & Peninsular RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. Town of Longview v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Adkins v. Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API