Legal Opinion

Haynes Automobile Co. v. City of Kokomo

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1917No. 22,708PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Howard Circuit Court; William C. Purdum, Judge. Drainage proceeding by the city of Kokomo, in which the Haynes Automobile Company and others appealed to the circuit court. From the judgment rendered, the Haynes Automobile Company and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtErwin, J.

This proceeding was to improve an open drain, known as “Petes Run” flowing through the south*11ern portion, of the city of "Kokomo, Indiana, by constructing a sewer, extending beyond the city corporation limits, under the provisions of §8729 Burns 1914, Acts 1909 p. 238. Within fifteen days after the filing of the assessment roll the three appellants, Haynes Automobile Company, Union Traction Company of Indiana, and Traction Land Company, each filed their written appeal to the Howard Circuit Court and moved that the appeals be submitted to and determined by the court and that they, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Stout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Marion, Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co. v. SimmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Indianapolis & Vincennes Railway Co. v. Capitol Paving & Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. State ex rel. BeckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson County Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1991
  2. Wedmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. W. H. Dreves, Inc. v. Oslo School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Gingerich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Rogers v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API