Kadane v. Clark
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
*459On Motion for Rehearing.
All parties, plaintiff and defendants, have filed motions for rehearing in this cause. Defendants (appellants) assign as error our conclusions wherein we overruled many of their assignments of error, and that even though we had held that a definition should have been given of the term “procure” yet some of the decisions cited by us did not include all of the elements that should enter into a proper definition of that term in the charge. We think and so hold that a definition of the term should embrace, in some suitable form, all that is contained in the charge given in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Settegast v. TimminsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Baum v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Danciger v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- M. O. Danciger & Emerich Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Dickinson v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.