Legal Opinion
M. O. Danciger & Emerich Oil Co. v. Smith
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1926No. Application No. 14872PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton
This proceeding is upon application for writ of error. The suit was originally instituted by N. K. Smith, the defendant in error, against the plaintiffs in error, to recover the sum of §60,000 commissions, alleged to be due him by reason of a contract for services as a broker to negotiate the sale of certain oil properties. After certain proceedings, not necessary to here notice, the case was tried by a jury on special issues, and upon the verdict a judgment was entered in favor of the defendant in error for $60,000. The case was carried to the Court of Civil Appeals, where the judgment 'of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thatcher v. RockwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Southern Minnesota RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Fuller v. New York Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Rand v. Iowa Central Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Danciger & Emerich Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Kadane v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Hornsby v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Blackburn v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Gerber Co., Inc. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.