Chattanooga Dayton Bus Line v. Burney

* On constitutionality or validity of statute or ordinance requiring owner or operators of automobiles for hire to carry insurance, see annotation in 22 A.L.R., 230; 39 A.L.R., 1029; R.C.L. Perm. Supp., p. 640. Each of the defendants in error, except G.L. Harrison, filed a separate suit against the plaintiffs in error for damages for personal injuries sustained when the automobile in which they were riding collided with a motor driven bus, owned and operated by plaintiffs in error, Chattanooga Dayton Bus Line and F.S. Wingate. The suit of G.L. Harrison is for damages sustained by him because…