Legal Opinion
Antichi v. New York Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 24, 1932No. Docket Nos. 4598, 4599, 4600PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
These eases were consolidated for trial and have been consolidated for hearing on appeal.
All three of the suits were upon a policy of insurance issued to Gene Antichi and A. E'. Mallett, partners doing business under the name of Sacramento-Coming Freight Line and against the New York Indemnity Company.
One suit was brought by the said Antichi and Mallett for $1,000 attorney fees expended in defending actions brought by W. J. McIntyre and Laura McIntyre against them. The suit of Laura McIntyre is to recover the sum of $7,733.30 and $29.50 costs based upon a judgment in her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Ogburn v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Cooper v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Price v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Bonfils v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Perkins v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- In Re Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Burstein v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.