Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Universal Underwriters Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1990No. 2341PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this appeal we consider whether the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s petition to amend its answer to the appellee’s counterclaim to assert the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense, more than four and a half years after the appellant filed its original answer.

On April 22, 1981, fire damaged the premises of John’s Chevrolet (“John’s”) on Frankford Avenue in Philadelphia. Several days later; John’s engaged the services of Lawrence Horowitz, Alan Horowitz and Bertram Horowitz, co-partners t/a Young Adjustment Company (“Young”), to aid them in adjusting their…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Robinson Protective Alarm Co. v. Bolger & PickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Somerset Community Hospital v. Allan B. Mitchell & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Brickman Group, Ltd. v. CGU Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Capobianchi v. Bic Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Discover Bank v. StuckaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Reynolds v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API