Legal Opinion

L.A. ex rel. Z.Kh. v. Hoffman

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 28, 2015No. Civ. Action No.: 14-6895 (FLW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLFSON, United States District Judge:

Pro se Plaintiffs L.A. and Z.R. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), who are convicted sex offenders, bring this case1 on behalf of themselves and similarly situated individuals (“Class A”), as well as their minor children, Z.Kh., Z.Y., Z.I., and Z.A. (collectively, the “Minor Plaintiffs”), and similarly situated individuals (“Class B”), challenging recent amendments to the New Jersey Megan’s Law2 (“the Amended Statute”), which require the publication of certain of Plaintiffs’ personal information to the New Jersey Sex Offender Internet Registry…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DEGENS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Edward Michael Daspin v. Matthew Daspin and Karen PolancoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  3. FAMILETTI v. ORTIZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  4. G.R. v. GREWALDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  5. In the Matter of Registrant R.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API