Legal Opinion
Edward Michael Daspin v. Matthew Daspin and Karen Polanco
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 21, 2025No. 2:24-cv-11501Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY EDWARD MICHAEL DASPIN, Case No. 2:24-cv-11501 (MEF) (SDA) Plaintiff, Hon. Stacey D. Adams v. OPINION AND ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF MATTHEW DASPIN and KAREN POLANCO, November 21, 2025 Defendants. THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte to consider the appointment of pro bono counsel for pro se Plaintiff Edward Michael Daspin (“Plaintiff”). Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, no oral argument was heard. After carefully reviewing the filings in this matter and the in person…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jeffery Montgomery v. Steven Pinchak Al Ortiz Terry Moore C. Naficy, Mr. C.M.S. Correctional Medical ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Paul Lamont Parham v. Marshall Johnson, Jr., Medical Doctor Charles J. Kozakieqicz Tom Forester, Commissioner Joseph Mazurkiewicz, ph.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Christy v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- L.A. ex rel. Z.Kh. v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Williams v. HaymanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007