Legal Opinion
Aktiebolaget Svenska Handels-Banken v. Chase Nat. Bank of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to remand this cause to the state court from which it had been removed at the instance of the defendant. The motion brings up for consideration the construction of Section 25(b) of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 632, which in part provides that defendant “may, at any time before the trial thereof, remove such suits1 from a State court into *834the district court * * It is undisputed that the suit in question is of the character which is embraced within § 25.
The facts briefly are as follows: Plaintiff, a Swedish bank, brought an action against the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Gregory v. HartleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hewitt v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Scharff v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Manas Y Pineiro v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Pan Atlantic Group, Inc. v. Republic InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Magel v. Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Hill v. CiticorpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Ponce Federal Bank v. Instituto Medico Del Norte, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.