Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Alan Haes, D/B/A H & H Distributing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1977No. 76-1784PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

Richard A. Haes appeals his conviction of three counts: for interstate transportation of an obscene motion picture, 18 U.S.C. § 2 and § 1465; for use of a common carrier to carry an obscene motion picture, 18 U.S.C. § 2 and § 1462; and for conspiracy to *769violate the same provisions, 18 U.S.C. § 371. Haes was indicted on twelve other counts but the jury was only able to reach a verdict on these three. The convictions rest on the determination that the film “Masters of Discipline” is obscene, a film seized by the government in a search of Haes’ office in Des Moines. Haes…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. State v. ThetfordWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States v. Ramon Rodriguez and Michael ButtigiegCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API