Legal Opinion

Davoll v. Webb

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided February 24, 1995No. 93-K-2263PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, Senior District Judge.

Before me is the motion of Plaintiffs Jack L. Davoll, Deborah A. Clair and Paul L. Escobedo to certify this action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and to bifurcate this action into two trial phases pursuant to Rule 42(b). I deny the motion.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

Plaintiffs bring this action seeking monetary damages, declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to: (a) the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213; (b) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (codified as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Floyd Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Harmon E. Welsh v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Hohider v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Intratex Gas Co. v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. Vaszlavik v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API