Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Breckenridge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 26, 1927No. 18304PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranson, C. J.

This is an original action filed under section 4107, C. O. S. 1921. The parties are referred to as petitioner and respondent.

A citation was duly issued and served on the respondent. A hearing was had in open court, at which time the respondent appeared in person and by counsel.

The complaint charges that the respondent is an attorney at law licensed by this court and engaged in the practice of law in the city of Tulsa; that as such he is an officer of this court; that on the 1st day of May, 1927, he violated his oath of office as such and breached the duties imposed upon him as an attorney at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. DavenportSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Assn. v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. In Re AdesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1934
  3. Warkentin v. KleinwachterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. State Board of Law Examiners v. SpriggsWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re MeekerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API