Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Webb v. Satz

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 8, 1978No. 60231 and 60269PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEILER, Judge.

These two cases, which have been consolidated and were argued here on the same date, involve the question of the proper venue in an action involving only corporate defendants. More precisely, the question is whether the language of the final clause of § 508.040, RSMo 1969, authorizes suit to be filed in any county where at least one of the corporate defendants has an office or agent for the transaction of usual and customary business or whether the clause applies only to a county, if one can be found, where each of the several corporate defendants maintain such an office or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boll v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Columbia National Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. McNeal v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Henning v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Whiteman v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McDonald's Corp. v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Todd v. RominesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. BJC Health System v. NeillSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. State Ex Rel. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. RuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Whaley v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API