Legal Opinion

In re London

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of a single *478justice of this court disbarring the respondent, Edward H. London, from the practice of law. The respondent claims error because (1) he was required to misrepresent the truth to third parties and bar counsel to protect client confidentiality; (2) the protracted investigation of his case violated the established timelines of the Board of Bar Overseers (board); (3) bar counsel failed to call witnesses who would have undermined bar counsel’s case and been beneficial to the respondent in his defense; (4) the hearing committee refused to make a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McLeodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. RamosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Bonan v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. In re EisenhauerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RobesonOregon Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re CobbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Lee v. Mt. Ivy Press, L.P.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. In re McBrideMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. In re GrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. In the Matter of StraussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API