St. Louis, K. C. & C. R. v. Conway
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIPS, District Judge.
The defendant in error recoverd judgment in the sum of $6,000 against the plaintiff in error, a railroad corporation. As the chief insistence of the plaintiff in error is that the trial court erred in refusing its request for a directed verdict, a review of the case as presented by the evidence is necessary.
At the time of the injury, the defendant in error was employed as head brakeman on a construction train used in building a railroad for the plaintiff in error between St. Louis and Kansas City, Mo. Pie had been so employed for several months prior to the injury…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Railroad Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gilbert v. Burlington, C. R. & N. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johns-Manville, Inc. v. PockerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Armour & Co. v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Bunker v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Fore v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Clark v. Colorado & N. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.