Armour & Co. v. Harcrow
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas; John C. Pollock, Judge. Action by William Harcrow against Armour & Co. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
Armour & Co., a corporation, complain that the court below erroneously refused to direct a verdict in its favor at the close of the evidence and permitted a judgment against it on the verdict of the jury in this case for $2,750.
[1,4] Counsel for the defendant in error, the plaintiff below, ask in their brief in reply to that of the defendant below that the writ of error he dismissed, because in the printed record the case is entitled on the first page thereof and at the top of each printed page thereafter Armour Packing Co. v. William Harcrow, the bill of exceptions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Hoag v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Davis v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Nash v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- W. A. Hover & Co. v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.