Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Curry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 21, 1992No. 1910784PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the petition for certiorari review to determine whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's order denying worker's compensation benefits in this case. Otis Randy Curry sued Interstate Express, Inc. ("Interstate"), seeking worker's compensation benefits after he was seriously injured in a motor vehicle accident. Curry claims he was an employee of Interstate; Interstate contends that Curry was an independent contractor and was thus not entitled to benefits.

The case was tried on October 12, 1990, and the trial court held that Curry had not proved he was an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Fordham v. Southern Phenix Textiles, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Stevens v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Ford v. MitchamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Alabama Emergency Room Administrative ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
  2. FORT JAMES HOLDING CO., INC. v. MorganCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. D & G TRUCKING, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  4. Weaver v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  5. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC v. PurserCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API