Legal Opinion

Sharp & Dohme, Inc. v. Waybourne

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 2, 1934No. 4323PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

The plaintiff, C. P. Waybourne, on July 2⅜ 1933, instituted this suit in the county court of Motley county against the defendant, Sharp & Dohme, Inc., a foreign corporation, and on August 26th thereafter, during the August term of said court, no answer having been filed, obtained a judgment by default for the sum of $950.

On November 2, 1933, before the adjournment of said term, the defendant moved the court to set aside the default judgment and grant a new trial, urging that no valid service was ever had upon it and also alleging a meritorious defense to the cause of action.

A…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Western Cottage Piano & Organ Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Paggi v. Rose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. National Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Parker v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. McEwenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. White Motor Company v. LodenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Rosenthal v. Frankfort Distillers Corp. Rosenthal v. Glazer's Wholesale Drug Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Hanover Modular Homes of Taft, Inc. v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API